From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Reality-based community (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this term has acquired any degree of notability since it was coined in 2004. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 18:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. It doesn't matter whether this phrase has become part of the language. It's important that Karl Rove coined it. Because it makes him sound ridiculous, his supporters probably want to delete it. It should be not only be retained, it should be included in the wiki entry on Karl Rove. User: Schoolwell —Preceding undated comment added 22:11, 30 December 2013

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 01:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Reality-based community (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this term has acquired any degree of notability since it was coined in 2004. — RHaworth ( talk · contribs) 18:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 03:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. It doesn't matter whether this phrase has become part of the language. It's important that Karl Rove coined it. Because it makes him sound ridiculous, his supporters probably want to delete it. It should be not only be retained, it should be included in the wiki entry on Karl Rove. User: Schoolwell —Preceding undated comment added 22:11, 30 December 2013

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 02:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook