The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. utcursch | talk 15:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Rayannapalem (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contains data but isn't written properly. Contains gibberish too. Looks like he took sentences from 50 places and dumped them together in an article. Deletion or improvement is required! Varun FEB2003 11:22, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:30, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep – Meets WP:GEOLAND as a legally-recognized populated place. The article has been copy edited since the time of nomination for deletion. North America ¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

• •  Request withdrawn Corrections made Varun FEB2003 13:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.