The result was keep. Certainly needs to be fixed/cleaned up of promo and puffery, but appears to meet notability and obviously meets sourcing ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Deprodded without comment. Obvious autobio. Very promotional. Another editor added sources, but they don't seem to be assertations of notability. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The article should remain as it is for the good of public knowledge. If anyone disagrees with its content then the facility exists to amend it. To remove it completely would be wrong as it would mean you are removing information which may be of use to someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.192.223 ( talk) 13:43, 19 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Certainly needs to be fixed/cleaned up of promo and puffery, but appears to meet notability and obviously meets sourcing ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC) reply
Deprodded without comment. Obvious autobio. Very promotional. Another editor added sources, but they don't seem to be assertations of notability. Ten Pound Hammer • ( What did I screw up now?) 19:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The article should remain as it is for the good of public knowledge. If anyone disagrees with its content then the facility exists to amend it. To remove it completely would be wrong as it would mean you are removing information which may be of use to someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.123.192.223 ( talk) 13:43, 19 April 2013 (UTC) reply