The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete As I have stated in the prod reason, this fails
WP:NBIO. Significant coverage not found.
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk) 01:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. He does has authored some work that is cited -
[1] (not all the hits are him (common name it would seem) - but many are). However, coverage of him as an individual does not seem meet SIGCOV, and his work does not seem to merit PROF/AUTHOR.
Icewhiz (
talk) 20:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete As I have stated in the prod reason, this fails
WP:NBIO. Significant coverage not found.
GeoffreyT2000 (
talk) 01:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. He does has authored some work that is cited -
[1] (not all the hits are him (common name it would seem) - but many are). However, coverage of him as an individual does not seem meet SIGCOV, and his work does not seem to merit PROF/AUTHOR.
Icewhiz (
talk) 20:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.