The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The page has been updated and as per citations the current page of Rachna Sharma who is a life strategist differs from the referred Rachna Sharma who is an air hostess.
Jalsut (
talk) 10:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The page as per my verification page is authentic in itself. The dispute regarding similar profile shall be closed. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Akshay0712 (
talk •
contribs) 10:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
As per third party citations Rachna Sharma profile as a life strategist is different from news link citing Rachna Sharma air hostess.
Ujjwalgill0712 (
talk) 10:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
*Comment Please don't open new/multiple
WP:SOCK and
WP:MEAT accounts to save this page. As you are a new editor, I won't report you at
WP:SPI, as you are not aware of
WP:MULTIPLE.
John Jaffar Janardan (
talk) 01:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC) striking confirmed sockpuppet
Atlantic306 (
talk) 03:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as this is clearly only here for PR, none of it actually amounts to any forms of actual substance.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
As per the reference section, the subject is on the advisory board and global partner of Mr. Sam Beard's GIFT Foundation who has been adviser to US presidents which can be clarified through
https://www.facebook.com/sambeardgift/?fref=nf&pnref=story post about the subject. As per this citation, subject is accomplished figure and amounts to great information.
Donna.beard (
talk) 08:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete as spam: " Indian Life Strategist, Leadership expert, Speaker, Philanthropist and Author..." etc. Sufficient RS coverage cannot be found.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 06:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The references cited are from proven and popular sources - newspapers/websites.
Donna.beard (
talk) 09:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The citations from reputed journals and newspapers establish credibility of the page.
Raghav.padhi (
talk) 09:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet, but some legit delete !votes came in later; also, the sources of the articles ought to be vetted. Relisting so that we can get more input.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Contributor issues aside (I did not focus on that when reviewing), I do see this
very nice spot of coverage in The Tribune (the The Tribune (Chandigarh)?), so I think a speedy delete might be somewhat preemptive in this case. However, I can't find any other significant sources at the time in nice newspapers, and
this trade mag coverage doesn't convince me, so unless more is found I agree Delete.Note there is some reputable coverage of her marriage:
[1],
[2] (tabloid this one?),
[3], but I'm on the fence in this case if they should be considered features on her or her famous hubby - leaning towards latter per
WP:Notability is not inherited. I also wonder if any of her companies are individually notable - I did not check.
Yvarta (
talk) 18:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Forgive me on not looking at photos/the top of page - I see there are two. On a side note, found this source
[4] in The Hindu that focuses partly on Sharma.
Yvarta (
talk) 18:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)reply
While researching on her I found pretty convincing interview referring to her in detail in yourstory.
Jalsut (
talk) 12:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: Subject fails to meet the
WP:GNG standard. Sources listed in the article are either unreliable or self-published.
Anup[Talk] 21:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanztalk 00:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The page has been updated and as per citations the current page of Rachna Sharma who is a life strategist differs from the referred Rachna Sharma who is an air hostess.
Jalsut (
talk) 10:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The page as per my verification page is authentic in itself. The dispute regarding similar profile shall be closed. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Akshay0712 (
talk •
contribs) 10:40, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
As per third party citations Rachna Sharma profile as a life strategist is different from news link citing Rachna Sharma air hostess.
Ujjwalgill0712 (
talk) 10:46, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
*Comment Please don't open new/multiple
WP:SOCK and
WP:MEAT accounts to save this page. As you are a new editor, I won't report you at
WP:SPI, as you are not aware of
WP:MULTIPLE.
John Jaffar Janardan (
talk) 01:53, 24 August 2016 (UTC) striking confirmed sockpuppet
Atlantic306 (
talk) 03:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as this is clearly only here for PR, none of it actually amounts to any forms of actual substance.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:12, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
As per the reference section, the subject is on the advisory board and global partner of Mr. Sam Beard's GIFT Foundation who has been adviser to US presidents which can be clarified through
https://www.facebook.com/sambeardgift/?fref=nf&pnref=story post about the subject. As per this citation, subject is accomplished figure and amounts to great information.
Donna.beard (
talk) 08:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Speedy delete as spam: " Indian Life Strategist, Leadership expert, Speaker, Philanthropist and Author..." etc. Sufficient RS coverage cannot be found.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 06:34, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The references cited are from proven and popular sources - newspapers/websites.
Donna.beard (
talk) 09:14, 3 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The citations from reputed journals and newspapers establish credibility of the page.
Raghav.padhi (
talk) 09:18, 3 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet, but some legit delete !votes came in later; also, the sources of the articles ought to be vetted. Relisting so that we can get more input.
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jo-Jo Eumerus (
talk,
contributions) 09:16, 28 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Contributor issues aside (I did not focus on that when reviewing), I do see this
very nice spot of coverage in The Tribune (the The Tribune (Chandigarh)?), so I think a speedy delete might be somewhat preemptive in this case. However, I can't find any other significant sources at the time in nice newspapers, and
this trade mag coverage doesn't convince me, so unless more is found I agree Delete.Note there is some reputable coverage of her marriage:
[1],
[2] (tabloid this one?),
[3], but I'm on the fence in this case if they should be considered features on her or her famous hubby - leaning towards latter per
WP:Notability is not inherited. I also wonder if any of her companies are individually notable - I did not check.
Yvarta (
talk) 18:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Forgive me on not looking at photos/the top of page - I see there are two. On a side note, found this source
[4] in The Hindu that focuses partly on Sharma.
Yvarta (
talk) 18:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)reply
While researching on her I found pretty convincing interview referring to her in detail in yourstory.
Jalsut (
talk) 12:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: Subject fails to meet the
WP:GNG standard. Sources listed in the article are either unreliable or self-published.
Anup[Talk] 21:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.