The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Sorry I didn't notice this speedy sooner. Y'all can always ping me on my talk page regarding speedy d's.
Missvain (
talk)
21:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Borderline A7 eligible article for a non notable rapper who a
before search shows lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore subject doesn’t satisfy any criterion from
WP:MUSICBIO. Celestina007 (
talk)
12:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
@
KylieTastic, Good point! But from my experience, I figured the article creator would be the type to create and re-create the article no matter what, hence I thought it wise to follow the AFD process so in future a G4 would come in handy. Celestina007 (
talk)
14:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete under A7, maybe even G11. There are 0 sources about the subject. I checked his Instagram page to see if he was famous or something, but even I have more followers. There might be a COI going on here. No proof of passing
WP:GNG,
WP:BASIC or
WP:ARTIST. The article has been rejected in Articles for Creation
here, but still created, suggesting that the article could've been recreated after a speedy deletion, so an AfD seems like the right choice. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^17:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Can somebody please close this AfD? I don’t mean to be impatient, but I think we have far more than enough reasons and consensus for a Speedy Delete.
Foxnpichu (
talk)
23:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Sorry I didn't notice this speedy sooner. Y'all can always ping me on my talk page regarding speedy d's.
Missvain (
talk)
21:28, 8 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Borderline A7 eligible article for a non notable rapper who a
before search shows lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Furthermore subject doesn’t satisfy any criterion from
WP:MUSICBIO. Celestina007 (
talk)
12:43, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
@
KylieTastic, Good point! But from my experience, I figured the article creator would be the type to create and re-create the article no matter what, hence I thought it wise to follow the AFD process so in future a G4 would come in handy. Celestina007 (
talk)
14:31, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Speedy Delete under A7, maybe even G11. There are 0 sources about the subject. I checked his Instagram page to see if he was famous or something, but even I have more followers. There might be a COI going on here. No proof of passing
WP:GNG,
WP:BASIC or
WP:ARTIST. The article has been rejected in Articles for Creation
here, but still created, suggesting that the article could've been recreated after a speedy deletion, so an AfD seems like the right choice. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^17:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Can somebody please close this AfD? I don’t mean to be impatient, but I think we have far more than enough reasons and consensus for a Speedy Delete.
Foxnpichu (
talk)
23:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.