From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The argument to keep based on WP:NPOL is not unreasonable, but this is not a clear-cut application of that guideline, and as such it cannot override the other concerns, or indeed the argument that this individual does not meet NPOL. Vanamonde ( Talk) 12:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Qadhi Saeed Almurooshid

Qadhi Saeed Almurooshid (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable/ Based on a single press release, None of the positions imply notability, and no reason to think any other ones would be substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices DGG ( talk ) 02:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 ( talk) 03:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 ( talk) 03:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 ( talk) 03:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep: Assessing using WP:NPOL, I think his position as an Executive Councilor for the Emirate of Dubai may meet NPOL. Despite having the term "executive" in its title, the Executive Council seems like a legislative body ( its Arabic Wikipedia entry, note the line "The Executive Council proposes and approves government policies and laws. It also supervises the implementation of local and federal laws, the establishment of government agencies, and the follow-up of their performance."). If I'm interpreting that correctly to mean that it's a legislative body, then the subject passes WP:NPOL. However, I'm !voting with weak keep because I may be incorrect with that assertion. Curbon7 ( talk) 04:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Nothing indicates this fellow is an elected politician. It appears he is a successful businessman appointed to an executive council. Nothing here meets GNG. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 08:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - clearly a prominent government member, director general of the Dubai Health Authority among other things. Googling قاضي المروشد gives plenty results. -- Soman ( talk) 13:12, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nom. DGG. Curbon7's logic can be considered because UAE is not a democratic country. - Hatchens ( talk) 14:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
even were it a democratic country, none of the positions he held would usually be elected positions. They're just administrative appointments. DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Prior to its nomination for deletion, this article was arguably vandalised, with an edit on 29 March removing 8/9ths of the content and all but one of its references and citations. The individual is clearly a public figure with a quite publicly documented track record of service in positions of authority within government (elected or not). Iskandar_323 ( talk) 7:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The material removed was a large mass of blatant promotionalism, with extensive name dropping of every possible dignitary, and incredible claims to have had magnificent success in everything he ever worked on. It's conceivable there may be a few valid references in among this, but the material was removed by a reliable and experienced editor, and was the only possible way to rescue what would have otherwise been a clear G11 DGG ( talk ) 21:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater ( talk) 06:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The argument to keep based on WP:NPOL is not unreasonable, but this is not a clear-cut application of that guideline, and as such it cannot override the other concerns, or indeed the argument that this individual does not meet NPOL. Vanamonde ( Talk) 12:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Qadhi Saeed Almurooshid

Qadhi Saeed Almurooshid (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable/ Based on a single press release, None of the positions imply notability, and no reason to think any other ones would be substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not press releases or blogs or postings or mere notices DGG ( talk ) 02:37, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 ( talk) 03:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 ( talk) 03:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 ( talk) 03:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Weak keep: Assessing using WP:NPOL, I think his position as an Executive Councilor for the Emirate of Dubai may meet NPOL. Despite having the term "executive" in its title, the Executive Council seems like a legislative body ( its Arabic Wikipedia entry, note the line "The Executive Council proposes and approves government policies and laws. It also supervises the implementation of local and federal laws, the establishment of government agencies, and the follow-up of their performance."). If I'm interpreting that correctly to mean that it's a legislative body, then the subject passes WP:NPOL. However, I'm !voting with weak keep because I may be incorrect with that assertion. Curbon7 ( talk) 04:01, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: Nothing indicates this fellow is an elected politician. It appears he is a successful businessman appointed to an executive council. Nothing here meets GNG. -- Whiteguru ( talk) 08:49, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - clearly a prominent government member, director general of the Dubai Health Authority among other things. Googling قاضي المروشد gives plenty results. -- Soman ( talk) 13:12, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete as per nom. DGG. Curbon7's logic can be considered because UAE is not a democratic country. - Hatchens ( talk) 14:25, 8 August 2021 (UTC) reply
even were it a democratic country, none of the positions he held would usually be elected positions. They're just administrative appointments. DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep - Prior to its nomination for deletion, this article was arguably vandalised, with an edit on 29 March removing 8/9ths of the content and all but one of its references and citations. The individual is clearly a public figure with a quite publicly documented track record of service in positions of authority within government (elected or not). Iskandar_323 ( talk) 7:30, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
The material removed was a large mass of blatant promotionalism, with extensive name dropping of every possible dignitary, and incredible claims to have had magnificent success in everything he ever worked on. It's conceivable there may be a few valid references in among this, but the material was removed by a reliable and experienced editor, and was the only possible way to rescue what would have otherwise been a clear G11 DGG ( talk ) 21:14, 14 August 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater ( talk) 06:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook