From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Joyous! Noise! 18:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Princess Bee

Princess Bee (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upon closer inspection, the entire Wikipedia page is a promotional page, which is not allowed by Wikipedia itself under CSD G11. The biography refers to self-celebratory publications. The lady is not known in the country under the pseudonym Princess Bee, and the only article that mentions her is a self-published one. She has no publications, no recognitions, and there is no trace of her on the web except through paid advertising outlets.

(statement made at request of anonymous new user who came on #wikipedia-en-help, and who I guided through tagging the article for deletion; prima facie the sources don't look terribly impressive, but I'm not up for assessing them all to see if they're really that terrible.) DS ( talk) 17:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Joyous! Noise! 18:24, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Princess Bee

Princess Bee (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upon closer inspection, the entire Wikipedia page is a promotional page, which is not allowed by Wikipedia itself under CSD G11. The biography refers to self-celebratory publications. The lady is not known in the country under the pseudonym Princess Bee, and the only article that mentions her is a self-published one. She has no publications, no recognitions, and there is no trace of her on the web except through paid advertising outlets.

(statement made at request of anonymous new user who came on #wikipedia-en-help, and who I guided through tagging the article for deletion; prima facie the sources don't look terribly impressive, but I'm not up for assessing them all to see if they're really that terrible.) DS ( talk) 17:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook