The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 20:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This article including all the companies which is not even functional or being merged into one another. this is classic example of blatant misuse of wikipedia being used for promoting one self and his own companies. This article has misused all the parameters from using Press coverage, non-notable media mentioned to the editing by none other than paid editor on wikipedia. I am nominating all of his companies on the ground of misuse of wikipedia for promoting personally. Light2021 ( talk) 06:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
The article contains other negative material:After the collapse of the business a series of articles by the Financial Times called into question several of the claims that had previously been made. Powa's self-proclaimed 2014 valuation of $2.6 billion was investigated and it was concluded that $106 million (£75 million) was a more accurate figure.[18] The claimed "10-year strategic alliance with ‘limitless’ potential” deal with China UnionPay that Dan Wagner personally described in a quote to the BBC as “Why did China UnionPay decide to partner with a little British technology company? We’ve trumped ApplePay and the rest of the world here.” was found to be unknown to China UnionPay who had their lawyers request that Powa stop making the false claims[19] and the majority of the partners upon which the investment and consequent valuation had been based, were found to be just Letters of Intent at best.[20]
I do not consider the article to be promotional.As of early 2016, the company had run into financial difficulties, missing payments to staff and third parties.[10] Its Hong Kong office had failed to pay its employees wages on time and to its ex-employees within 7 days, with some of the employees having to seek help from the Labor Department.
Just curious if you have read all those articles yourself or just made a copy-paste job here and taken entire space for this discussion. If you will read all those media coverage, it is merely Press coverage or typical marketing of any company. secondly this article is written by the company itself. Light2021 ( talk) 10:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 ( talk) 20:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
This article including all the companies which is not even functional or being merged into one another. this is classic example of blatant misuse of wikipedia being used for promoting one self and his own companies. This article has misused all the parameters from using Press coverage, non-notable media mentioned to the editing by none other than paid editor on wikipedia. I am nominating all of his companies on the ground of misuse of wikipedia for promoting personally. Light2021 ( talk) 06:17, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)Sources with quotes
|
---|
|
The article contains other negative material:After the collapse of the business a series of articles by the Financial Times called into question several of the claims that had previously been made. Powa's self-proclaimed 2014 valuation of $2.6 billion was investigated and it was concluded that $106 million (£75 million) was a more accurate figure.[18] The claimed "10-year strategic alliance with ‘limitless’ potential” deal with China UnionPay that Dan Wagner personally described in a quote to the BBC as “Why did China UnionPay decide to partner with a little British technology company? We’ve trumped ApplePay and the rest of the world here.” was found to be unknown to China UnionPay who had their lawyers request that Powa stop making the false claims[19] and the majority of the partners upon which the investment and consequent valuation had been based, were found to be just Letters of Intent at best.[20]
I do not consider the article to be promotional.As of early 2016, the company had run into financial difficulties, missing payments to staff and third parties.[10] Its Hong Kong office had failed to pay its employees wages on time and to its ex-employees within 7 days, with some of the employees having to seek help from the Labor Department.
Just curious if you have read all those articles yourself or just made a copy-paste job here and taken entire space for this discussion. If you will read all those media coverage, it is merely Press coverage or typical marketing of any company. secondly this article is written by the company itself. Light2021 ( talk) 10:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)