The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I am unable to find any evidence that this topic has been discussed at all in any reliable sources that are independent of its creator
Gilles Baroin (also on AfD). So it seems
WP:TOOSOON to have an article on this topic, if ever.
Sławomir Biały (
talk) 15:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. It's discussed in passing in
arXiv:1208.4774, which is not by Baroin. But I don't think that's enough for
WP:GNG. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 05:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete The Arxiv paper mentioned above was by Amiot, a collaborator of Baroin, so independence is questionable. I was unable to find independent sources discussing this topic and so it seems to fail general notability guidelines per
WP:GNG. I agree that this may be a case of
WP:TOOSOON for RS to develop. --
Mark viking (
talk) 18:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete At least for now, until it gets enough reliable coverage to pass GNG.
LM2000 (
talk) 04:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I am unable to find any evidence that this topic has been discussed at all in any reliable sources that are independent of its creator
Gilles Baroin (also on AfD). So it seems
WP:TOOSOON to have an article on this topic, if ever.
Sławomir Biały (
talk) 15:21, 3 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. It's discussed in passing in
arXiv:1208.4774, which is not by Baroin. But I don't think that's enough for
WP:GNG. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 05:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete The Arxiv paper mentioned above was by Amiot, a collaborator of Baroin, so independence is questionable. I was unable to find independent sources discussing this topic and so it seems to fail general notability guidelines per
WP:GNG. I agree that this may be a case of
WP:TOOSOON for RS to develop. --
Mark viking (
talk) 18:54, 15 January 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete At least for now, until it gets enough reliable coverage to pass GNG.
LM2000 (
talk) 04:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.