- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Piwik PRO
- Piwik PRO ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, routine funding news, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. The company has raised $2M which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment This is distinct from "Piwik", recently renamed as " Matomo" [1]. AllyD ( talk) 08:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on a brand/product, describing its proposition. The closest to an independent source is the July 2016 DMN item based on an interview with the founder but is not sufficient to demonstrate notability, whether by WP:NSOFT or WP:CORPDEPTH. There is no article on the Clearcode parent company (nor on the Polish Wikipedia) so a redirect is not feasible. AllyD ( talk) 08:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The goal of adding this page about Piwik PRO is fully informative. I've tried to add facts about history and connection with open-source Piwik project, add information about investments related with Piwik PRO. Another motive of creating this page was adding it to the listings of Web Analytics tools and Tag Manager which are fundamental parts of this Piwik PRO Marketing Suite to improve those listings and provide more information to the Wikipedia readers. I will be happy if you will be able to prepare some strict instructions how to improve this article to respect all the Wikipedia guidlines. Thank you in advance! User:Szymongrzesiak ( talk) 09:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - For Wikipedia it all comes down to the depth of coverage in reliable sources. There is no WP:CORPDEPTH here so the topic would not meet notability requirements. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 03:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I've added some additional resources from the couple of reliable and established websites. Please review. Thanks! User:Szymongrzesiak ( talk) 08:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill technology company. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or marketing. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 15:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig ( talk) 08:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Piwik PRO
- Piwik PRO ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, routine funding news, WP:SPIP and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. The company has raised $2M which strongly suggests it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman ( talk) 01:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Baby miss fortune 07:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment This is distinct from "Piwik", recently renamed as " Matomo" [1]. AllyD ( talk) 08:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: An article on a brand/product, describing its proposition. The closest to an independent source is the July 2016 DMN item based on an interview with the founder but is not sufficient to demonstrate notability, whether by WP:NSOFT or WP:CORPDEPTH. There is no article on the Clearcode parent company (nor on the Polish Wikipedia) so a redirect is not feasible. AllyD ( talk) 08:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The goal of adding this page about Piwik PRO is fully informative. I've tried to add facts about history and connection with open-source Piwik project, add information about investments related with Piwik PRO. Another motive of creating this page was adding it to the listings of Web Analytics tools and Tag Manager which are fundamental parts of this Piwik PRO Marketing Suite to improve those listings and provide more information to the Wikipedia readers. I will be happy if you will be able to prepare some strict instructions how to improve this article to respect all the Wikipedia guidlines. Thank you in advance! User:Szymongrzesiak ( talk) 09:04, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - For Wikipedia it all comes down to the depth of coverage in reliable sources. There is no WP:CORPDEPTH here so the topic would not meet notability requirements. -- CNMall41 ( talk) 03:55, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I've added some additional resources from the couple of reliable and established websites. Please review. Thanks! User:Szymongrzesiak ( talk) 08:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill technology company. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion or marketing. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing ++ 15:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.