The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Neither smalltown mayors nor county government freeholders get an automatic free pass over
WP:NPOL just because they exist, and being the first member of an underrepresented equity group to accomplish those things in his own county, but not even close to the first in the entire nation, is not in and of itself an instant notability clincher in the absence of the depth, range and volume of media coverage it would have taken to get any other smalltown mayor or county freeholder over the bar. And even judges don't get an automatic inclusion freebie just because the body they served on was technically "statewide" — a state Supreme Court judge would obviously be notable, but workers compensation tribunal judges aren't "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to get over
WP:GNG on the sources. Even our notability standards for judges, per
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges/Notability, still distinguish between the senior courts and the junior or specialty courts, and grant no notability freebies to the latter.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete so far - Not a prominent enough position to convey inherent notability. I googled and I'm not seeing significant coverage in secondary sources. So delete.
Ikjbagl (
talk)
05:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Neither smalltown mayors nor county government freeholders get an automatic free pass over
WP:NPOL just because they exist, and being the first member of an underrepresented equity group to accomplish those things in his own county, but not even close to the first in the entire nation, is not in and of itself an instant notability clincher in the absence of the depth, range and volume of media coverage it would have taken to get any other smalltown mayor or county freeholder over the bar. And even judges don't get an automatic inclusion freebie just because the body they served on was technically "statewide" — a state Supreme Court judge would obviously be notable, but workers compensation tribunal judges aren't "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to get over
WP:GNG on the sources. Even our notability standards for judges, per
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges/Notability, still distinguish between the senior courts and the junior or specialty courts, and grant no notability freebies to the latter.
Bearcat (
talk)
13:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete so far - Not a prominent enough position to convey inherent notability. I googled and I'm not seeing significant coverage in secondary sources. So delete.
Ikjbagl (
talk)
05:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.