From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Peter Bjalončík (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NHOCKEY criteria 1 through 5, and I see no SIGCOV that would meet WP:GNG. PK650 ( talk) 10:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

* Delete The Slovak league does not meet the criteria for notability, nor does the French league. And no senior-level international games. Kaiser matias ( talk) 16:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  • You're right, and I apparently can't read. I'm striking my vote here, though would argue that a discussion on the standards is probably in order (I don't think the Slovak league is strong enough, personally). Kaiser matias ( talk) 07:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: I don't know what happened, but in WP:NHOCKEY wrote, that you can create player, whic have played 200 games for the Slovak league (Tipos Extraliga).— Preceding unsigned comment added by RafaelUk ( talkcontribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless ( talk) 19:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. The sources in the article are a stats-type profile with quotes from him, coverage on his own team's website, and routine transactional coverage. Nothing approaching significance in IRS. JoelleJay ( talk) 06:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Peter Bjalončík (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NHOCKEY criteria 1 through 5, and I see no SIGCOV that would meet WP:GNG. PK650 ( talk) 10:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

* Delete The Slovak league does not meet the criteria for notability, nor does the French league. And no senior-level international games. Kaiser matias ( talk) 16:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  • You're right, and I apparently can't read. I'm striking my vote here, though would argue that a discussion on the standards is probably in order (I don't think the Slovak league is strong enough, personally). Kaiser matias ( talk) 07:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC) reply
  • Comment: I don't know what happened, but in WP:NHOCKEY wrote, that you can create player, whic have played 200 games for the Slovak league (Tipos Extraliga).— Preceding unsigned comment added by RafaelUk ( talkcontribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 15 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless ( talk) 19:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. The sources in the article are a stats-type profile with quotes from him, coverage on his own team's website, and routine transactional coverage. Nothing approaching significance in IRS. JoelleJay ( talk) 06:37, 27 July 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook