The result was no consensus. The new sources, reliable though they might be, concern construction and funding, not the Temple itself as a building. Yet, I don't see a consensus to Delete this religious building so I'm closing this as No consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about a Hindu temple lacking third party sources except for two passing mentions. The subject is potentially notable and someone with better access to Australian sources than me may be able to find some in depth coverage, but if not, delete. Mccapra ( talk) 17:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
The result was no consensus. The new sources, reliable though they might be, concern construction and funding, not the Temple itself as a building. Yet, I don't see a consensus to Delete this religious building so I'm closing this as No consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 04:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article about a Hindu temple lacking third party sources except for two passing mentions. The subject is potentially notable and someone with better access to Australian sources than me may be able to find some in depth coverage, but if not, delete. Mccapra ( talk) 17:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Liz
Read!
Talk!
20:58, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
North America
1000
04:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)