- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Perizzite. ...and placing a request at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Uncontroversial technical requests to move the page to Perizzites ( non-admin closure) Lourdes 06:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Perizzites
- Perizzites ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is simply a much shorter counterpart to Perizzite. They are duplicates -- they're both about the Perizzites. All meaningful content in Perizzites is found, sometimes in somewhat different wording, in the longer Perizzite. I figure we shouldn't have the both of them. Alephb ( talk) 05:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This article is actually older than perizzite by four years but the latter article is longer and better sourced. I don't see anything in the extant article that needs to be merged into the newer bettter perizzite. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Perizzite, per nominator rationale. No benefit to having its own page - Galatz Talk 17:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect - seems clear enough to me, and there is nothing to merge that isn't already in the other article. Smmurphy( Talk) 22:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Perizzite, which is the more comprehensive article. Alansohn ( talk) 01:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect. However, Perizzites is the more appropriate name for a merged article. I presume the closing admin will know how to manage that. Peterkingiron ( talk) 09:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect Perizzite to here, after moving content from there to here, per above. Icewhiz ( talk) 19:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Perizzite. ...and placing a request at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Uncontroversial technical requests to move the page to Perizzites ( non-admin closure) Lourdes 06:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Perizzites
- Perizzites ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is simply a much shorter counterpart to Perizzite. They are duplicates -- they're both about the Perizzites. All meaningful content in Perizzites is found, sometimes in somewhat different wording, in the longer Perizzite. I figure we shouldn't have the both of them. Alephb ( talk) 05:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 15:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This article is actually older than perizzite by four years but the latter article is longer and better sourced. I don't see anything in the extant article that needs to be merged into the newer bettter perizzite. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman ( talk) 15:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Perizzite, per nominator rationale. No benefit to having its own page - Galatz Talk 17:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect - seems clear enough to me, and there is nothing to merge that isn't already in the other article. Smmurphy( Talk) 22:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Perizzite, which is the more comprehensive article. Alansohn ( talk) 01:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect. However, Perizzites is the more appropriate name for a merged article. I presume the closing admin will know how to manage that. Peterkingiron ( talk) 09:55, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect Perizzite to here, after moving content from there to here, per above. Icewhiz ( talk) 19:02, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.