The result was keep. Even disregarding throwaway !votes, strong consensus to keep. If someone strongly disagrees, feel free to revert the close. ( non-admin closure) Regards, MacMed talk stalk 23:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:MUSIC; a following on the internet produces a lot of ghits, which tends to obscure how thin the coverage really is. For our purposes a relatively successful myspace band. Discussed last year without consensus. - Simon Dodd { U· T· C· WP:LAW } 13:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply
^^^ you suck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.239.5 ( talk) 19:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply
They are featured in the current issue of Guitar World: see [1] That's notable enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.215.144.191 ( talk) 20:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Just to be clear, if there were another magazine like Guitar World that had featured them, would that be enough, or are you suggesting that the notability of the magazine is questionable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.75.160 ( talk) 01:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Even disregarding throwaway !votes, strong consensus to keep. If someone strongly disagrees, feel free to revert the close. ( non-admin closure) Regards, MacMed talk stalk 23:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:MUSIC; a following on the internet produces a lot of ghits, which tends to obscure how thin the coverage really is. For our purposes a relatively successful myspace band. Discussed last year without consensus. - Simon Dodd { U· T· C· WP:LAW } 13:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply
^^^ you suck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.239.5 ( talk) 19:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC) reply
They are featured in the current issue of Guitar World: see [1] That's notable enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.215.144.191 ( talk) 20:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC) reply
Just to be clear, if there were another magazine like Guitar World that had featured them, would that be enough, or are you suggesting that the notability of the magazine is questionable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.75.160 ( talk) 01:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC) reply