The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not meet football team notability guidelines. Team is not in a fully professional league. Does not meet
WP:GNG either.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 03:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 03:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable amateur team. Cannot find evidence of participation in National Cup competitions, nor is it in a national league, so fails
WP:NFOOTY (the professionalism of a league is not relevant per this guideline). Cannot find much in the way of coverage, seems mainly about youth teams.
Fenix down (
talk) 15:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability, fails
WP:GNG.
GiantSnowman 16:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - Canada's National Cup competitions are either for fully-professional teams (such as the
Voyageurs Cup) or fully amateur teams (such as the
The Challenge Trophy). There are no national competitions for semi-professional teams; this is mostly a function of the cost and geography of the country, so such cups tend to be regional. However, the Penticton Pinnacles are members of a league that has in the past been sanctioned by the
United States Soccer Federation, and US members of that league have played in the
US Open Cup. As such, the technicality of the lack of any national soccer competitions that this team could play in, is just that - a technicality.
Nfitz (
talk) 19:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - OK, so it may be difficult / impossible for the club to enter a competition that would lead to a technical NFOOTY pass, so could you indicate how the club passes GNG? Just because NFOOTY can't be satisfied, doesn't mean an automatic keep.
Fenix down (
talk) 09:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Actually, because NFOOTY can't pass means an automatic delete unless the subject meets another criteria.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 16:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fails
WP:GNG, a non-notable club.
JMHamo (
talk) 01:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not meet football team notability guidelines. Team is not in a fully professional league. Does not meet
WP:GNG either.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 03:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
• Gene93k (
talk) 03:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - Non-notable amateur team. Cannot find evidence of participation in National Cup competitions, nor is it in a national league, so fails
WP:NFOOTY (the professionalism of a league is not relevant per this guideline). Cannot find much in the way of coverage, seems mainly about youth teams.
Fenix down (
talk) 15:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability, fails
WP:GNG.
GiantSnowman 16:50, 21 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - Canada's National Cup competitions are either for fully-professional teams (such as the
Voyageurs Cup) or fully amateur teams (such as the
The Challenge Trophy). There are no national competitions for semi-professional teams; this is mostly a function of the cost and geography of the country, so such cups tend to be regional. However, the Penticton Pinnacles are members of a league that has in the past been sanctioned by the
United States Soccer Federation, and US members of that league have played in the
US Open Cup. As such, the technicality of the lack of any national soccer competitions that this team could play in, is just that - a technicality.
Nfitz (
talk) 19:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - OK, so it may be difficult / impossible for the club to enter a competition that would lead to a technical NFOOTY pass, so could you indicate how the club passes GNG? Just because NFOOTY can't be satisfied, doesn't mean an automatic keep.
Fenix down (
talk) 09:01, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Actually, because NFOOTY can't pass means an automatic delete unless the subject meets another criteria.
Walter Görlitz (
talk) 16:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - Fails
WP:GNG, a non-notable club.
JMHamo (
talk) 01:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.