The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:00, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an artist. While there's enough substance here that she likely would be eligible to keep a properly sourced article, the problem in this instance is that it's resting almost entirely on primary (own website, websites of galleries with which she's directly affiliated) and bloggy/ YouTubey unreliable sources. Only one reference here, Canadian Art (#4), counts for anything toward the meeting of WP:GNG — and even that source isn't substantively about her, but merely contains a two-sentence namecheck of her within a list of capsule reviews of several art shows. Being able to primary-source her existence isn't what gets an artist into Wikipedia — real media coverage is, but there isn't any of that here. Delete unless the sourcing can be utterly overhauled. Bearcat ( talk) 16:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis ( talk) 02:00, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
WP:BLP of an artist. While there's enough substance here that she likely would be eligible to keep a properly sourced article, the problem in this instance is that it's resting almost entirely on primary (own website, websites of galleries with which she's directly affiliated) and bloggy/ YouTubey unreliable sources. Only one reference here, Canadian Art (#4), counts for anything toward the meeting of WP:GNG — and even that source isn't substantively about her, but merely contains a two-sentence namecheck of her within a list of capsule reviews of several art shows. Being able to primary-source her existence isn't what gets an artist into Wikipedia — real media coverage is, but there isn't any of that here. Delete unless the sourcing can be utterly overhauled. Bearcat ( talk) 16:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)