The result of the debate was delete. -- Pablo D. Flores ( Talk) 14:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Previously speedy-deleted. The original article contained non-notable content and included a link to a blog created to discredit the subject. This new re-creation contains poor references. I'm assuming the original contributions were meant as an attack page. -- Longhair 09:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply
(Delete. Non-notable would-be local politician. Sling it in the untidyness bin. Anthony Appleyard 18:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- Pablo D. Flores ( Talk) 14:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC) reply
Previously speedy-deleted. The original article contained non-notable content and included a link to a blog created to discredit the subject. This new re-creation contains poor references. I'm assuming the original contributions were meant as an attack page. -- Longhair 09:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply
(Delete. Non-notable would-be local politician. Sling it in the untidyness bin. Anthony Appleyard 18:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC) reply