The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not appear notable. See previous revisions of the article for more references (I have removed sections for copyright violations), but those sources do not appear to substantially prove notability.
Darylgolden(
talk)Ping when replying 13:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as pure
spam. Clearly an employee has been tasked with the job of writing a promotional piece about her boss. Unfortunate.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete mere PROMO of a non-notable, business promoter.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 14:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is written like a public relations profile and referenced entirely to
primary sources with no evidence of
reliable source coverage shown whatsoever. It's also a
conflict of interest, as the creator's username plainly identifies her as an employee of Renaud Investments. As always, Wikipedia is not a free
LinkedIn clone — people are not entitled to decide for themselves that they get to have a Wikipedia article, but rather we make that decision according to our rules.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Does not appear notable. See previous revisions of the article for more references (I have removed sections for copyright violations), but those sources do not appear to substantially prove notability.
Darylgolden(
talk)Ping when replying 13:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as pure
spam. Clearly an employee has been tasked with the job of writing a promotional piece about her boss. Unfortunate.
WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:08, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete mere PROMO of a non-notable, business promoter.
E.M.Gregory (
talk) 14:02, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete. This is written like a public relations profile and referenced entirely to
primary sources with no evidence of
reliable source coverage shown whatsoever. It's also a
conflict of interest, as the creator's username plainly identifies her as an employee of Renaud Investments. As always, Wikipedia is not a free
LinkedIn clone — people are not entitled to decide for themselves that they get to have a Wikipedia article, but rather we make that decision according to our rules.
Bearcat (
talk) 20:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.