The result was delete. Both the weight of the opinions here and the essay WP:MMANOT, which does in my experience carry some weight, argue against inclusion here, indicate this result. -- j⚛e decker talk 08:26, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable MMA fighter with few fights and non-Top tier. Does not meet WP:MMANOT or WP:GNG. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Response to the above from Patrick Jenkinson by looking at "Criteria supporting notability according to WP:MMANOT". Pannie Kianzad is considered one of the hottest prospects outside of the UFC. Both Swedish and European interest is big, even american outlets have written about her (first criteria). This weekend she's fighting for bantamweight title at Cage Warriors 74 in the co-main event (second criteria). She has fought for Superior Challenge (Scandinavias largest MMA-organisation), Cage Warriors (Europes largest MMA-organisation) and PRO FC (a large Russian MMA-organization) (third criteria). In other words, she's notable enough to have a wikipedia page in english.
Comment - I'm sorry if I overstepped some kind of boundary, not my intention. But I don't agree that there is a consensus, just a majority towards a stand point. But I strongly feel that Kianzad fulfills the criteria and that there is a bias against anything not American. three out of four organizations that are classed as top tier are from the USA. No European organization? It is ridiculous that anything not UFC, Invicta, Bellator is not top tier. Cage Warriors have multiple shows around the world and have signed the very best fighters on the European scene. I strongly feel the bias against our part of the world. But even greater there is a bias against women in MMA. For example - why has UCMMA champ Georgio Andrews a wiki page that isn't contested? UCMMA is a smaller organisation and classed as second tier. I believe it is based on gender when it comes to Kianzad and that is a shame. User:Patrick Jenkinson
The result was delete. Both the weight of the opinions here and the essay WP:MMANOT, which does in my experience carry some weight, argue against inclusion here, indicate this result. -- j⚛e decker talk 08:26, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Non-notable MMA fighter with few fights and non-Top tier. Does not meet WP:MMANOT or WP:GNG. Peter Rehse ( talk) 11:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Response to the above from Patrick Jenkinson by looking at "Criteria supporting notability according to WP:MMANOT". Pannie Kianzad is considered one of the hottest prospects outside of the UFC. Both Swedish and European interest is big, even american outlets have written about her (first criteria). This weekend she's fighting for bantamweight title at Cage Warriors 74 in the co-main event (second criteria). She has fought for Superior Challenge (Scandinavias largest MMA-organisation), Cage Warriors (Europes largest MMA-organisation) and PRO FC (a large Russian MMA-organization) (third criteria). In other words, she's notable enough to have a wikipedia page in english.
Comment - I'm sorry if I overstepped some kind of boundary, not my intention. But I don't agree that there is a consensus, just a majority towards a stand point. But I strongly feel that Kianzad fulfills the criteria and that there is a bias against anything not American. three out of four organizations that are classed as top tier are from the USA. No European organization? It is ridiculous that anything not UFC, Invicta, Bellator is not top tier. Cage Warriors have multiple shows around the world and have signed the very best fighters on the European scene. I strongly feel the bias against our part of the world. But even greater there is a bias against women in MMA. For example - why has UCMMA champ Georgio Andrews a wiki page that isn't contested? UCMMA is a smaller organisation and classed as second tier. I believe it is based on gender when it comes to Kianzad and that is a shame. User:Patrick Jenkinson