The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is one of a series of articles created by editors/socks with conflict of interest, who also apparently run some movie and music PR websites; see
ANI report and
SPI report. This article cites no independent reliable source, and given that it was created the editors involved, I don't believe any such source exists. Article therefore fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NFILM.
Abecedare (
talk) 15:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Maybe, instead of assuming a source doesn't exist because of a users supposed COI, you could have a look for the source yourself and remove all doubt. --
Skamecrazy123 (
talk) 08:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Withdraw Thanks for finding the sources
User:MichaelQSchmidt. The film indeed seems notable enough. Would you mind adding the sources you found to the article? A side note: this is not a simple case of misguided or socking editors; but of undisclosed paid advocacy.
Abecedare (
talk) 15:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Just got home, but will be happy to do so. YSchmidt, Michael Q. 05:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This is one of a series of articles created by editors/socks with conflict of interest, who also apparently run some movie and music PR websites; see
ANI report and
SPI report. This article cites no independent reliable source, and given that it was created the editors involved, I don't believe any such source exists. Article therefore fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NFILM.
Abecedare (
talk) 15:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Maybe, instead of assuming a source doesn't exist because of a users supposed COI, you could have a look for the source yourself and remove all doubt. --
Skamecrazy123 (
talk) 08:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Withdraw Thanks for finding the sources
User:MichaelQSchmidt. The film indeed seems notable enough. Would you mind adding the sources you found to the article? A side note: this is not a simple case of misguided or socking editors; but of undisclosed paid advocacy.
Abecedare (
talk) 15:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)reply
Just got home, but will be happy to do so. YSchmidt, Michael Q. 05:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.