The result was keep. There was consensus that this topic has received sustained, significant coverage in reliable sources. One delete !vote effectively called to WP:TNT the article because it "seems to fall short of the expected encyclopedic depth and quality", but no consensus developed for that option. The other delete !vote was a conclusory WP:JNN. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 01:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
per WP:SINGLEEVENT. This fails WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 13:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep. This isn't about a single event, and coverage has been ongoing for months and months at this point (see here, here, and here). The article needs an update, but as usual, AfD isn't clean-up. Cortador ( talk) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete While the topic has indeed received extended coverage over a significant period, the accumulation of sources does not inherently justify the retention of an article. The core issue pertains to notability and whether the subject matter has sustained coverage that adds substantial information. The main concern is the notability and consistent, in-depth coverage. The provided references don’t seem to enhance the topic’s comprehension. While it’s true that the AfD isn’t just for clean-up, it does allow for evaluating an article’s significance. In this instance, the article seems to fall short of the expected encyclopedic depth and quality. samee converse 02:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:Notability. Also lack of depth. Wikibear47 ( talk) 00:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
15:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
01:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
10:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
The result was keep. There was consensus that this topic has received sustained, significant coverage in reliable sources. One delete !vote effectively called to WP:TNT the article because it "seems to fall short of the expected encyclopedic depth and quality", but no consensus developed for that option. The other delete !vote was a conclusory WP:JNN. (non-admin closure) voorts ( talk/ contributions) 01:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
per WP:SINGLEEVENT. This fails WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk | contribs) 13:16, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Keep. This isn't about a single event, and coverage has been ongoing for months and months at this point (see here, here, and here). The article needs an update, but as usual, AfD isn't clean-up. Cortador ( talk) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete While the topic has indeed received extended coverage over a significant period, the accumulation of sources does not inherently justify the retention of an article. The core issue pertains to notability and whether the subject matter has sustained coverage that adds substantial information. The main concern is the notability and consistent, in-depth coverage. The provided references don’t seem to enhance the topic’s comprehension. While it’s true that the AfD isn’t just for clean-up, it does allow for evaluating an article’s significance. In this instance, the article seems to fall short of the expected encyclopedic depth and quality. samee converse 02:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:Notability. Also lack of depth. Wikibear47 ( talk) 00:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
15:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
The Herald (Benison) (
talk)
01:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
10:12, 14 May 2024 (UTC)