The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Didn't receive enough national coverage or major awards to meet CFB notability standards and never appeared in an NFL or CFL game. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 20:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Nominator ignores the
WP:GNG standard which is key here. My preliminary search does turn up some significant coverage: (1)
this', (2)
this, and (3) this
two-
parter, all from the Clarion-Ledger. However, to pass
WP:GNG, such coverage must extend to multiple publications and so far I'm not finding significant coverage in other publications. (I am not counting reports of his arrest like
this and
this). If someone finds significant coverage in other reliable sources, I am open to changing my mind.
Cbl62 (
talk) 01:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Defensive linemen generally don't get a lot of press, and that seems to be the case here. Subject does not pass
WP:GNG.--
Paul McDonald (
talk) 18:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete Didn't receive enough national coverage or major awards to meet CFB notability standards and never appeared in an NFL or CFL game. Best,
GPL93 (
talk) 20:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Nominator ignores the
WP:GNG standard which is key here. My preliminary search does turn up some significant coverage: (1)
this', (2)
this, and (3) this
two-
parter, all from the Clarion-Ledger. However, to pass
WP:GNG, such coverage must extend to multiple publications and so far I'm not finding significant coverage in other publications. (I am not counting reports of his arrest like
this and
this). If someone finds significant coverage in other reliable sources, I am open to changing my mind.
Cbl62 (
talk) 01:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Defensive linemen generally don't get a lot of press, and that seems to be the case here. Subject does not pass
WP:GNG.--
Paul McDonald (
talk) 18:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.