- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 16:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Out & Loud PIQFF ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This minor event fails WP:GNG and WP:DEPTH. BonkHindrance ( talk) 00:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CptViraj ( 📧) 01:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CptViraj ( 📧) 01:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CptViraj ( 📧) 01:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 01:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hello; I only noticed now that this has been proposed for deletion as per PROD I did have same thoughts about not having too many sources but felt that it had enough to qualify. It might have more but I decided to keep those which were most significant. Besides, it seems relevant to the LGBTQ community in India. I was in fact surprised to see the proposed deletion after it was reviewed by @ DragonflySixtyseven:. Nonetheless, let's see what others feel about it. IamKhandelwal ( talk) 12:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Please see this explanation here, and leave me out of this. Thank you. DS ( talk) 19:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Falls short of WP:GNG. WP:TOOSOON at a minimum. Dorama285 ( talk) 23:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Sources are reliable, but they are just routine coverage announcing it each year (lacks WP:DEPTH). -- MarioGom ( talk) 11:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 16:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Out & Loud PIQFF ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This minor event fails WP:GNG and WP:DEPTH. BonkHindrance ( talk) 00:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CptViraj ( 📧) 01:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CptViraj ( 📧) 01:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CptViraj ( 📧) 01:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 01:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hello; I only noticed now that this has been proposed for deletion as per PROD I did have same thoughts about not having too many sources but felt that it had enough to qualify. It might have more but I decided to keep those which were most significant. Besides, it seems relevant to the LGBTQ community in India. I was in fact surprised to see the proposed deletion after it was reviewed by @ DragonflySixtyseven:. Nonetheless, let's see what others feel about it. IamKhandelwal ( talk) 12:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Please see this explanation here, and leave me out of this. Thank you. DS ( talk) 19:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Falls short of WP:GNG. WP:TOOSOON at a minimum. Dorama285 ( talk) 23:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Sources are reliable, but they are just routine coverage announcing it each year (lacks WP:DEPTH). -- MarioGom ( talk) 11:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.