From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice against continuing a merge discussion. Mojo Hand ( talk) 16:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Otto Mann (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references and no real-world information. The Almightey Drill ( talk) 00:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Weak keep per 1 and 2 and other such references. There's enough real-world, non-Simpsons analysis of the character to warrant an article. I don't necessarily like it but trying to delete even "second tier" characters from franchises like The Simpsons will often be a fruitless endeavour. Stalwart 111 10:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. He's more notable than anyone who will ever comment in this AFD. :) -- do ncr am 01:24, 23 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Merge to List of recurring The Simpsons characters. Otto is no more notable than Agnes Skinner, Kirk Van Houten, Helen Lovejoy, or a host of other characters who have already been redirected to that article.-- NukeofEarl ( talk) 18:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, as per NukeofEarl. Not significant enough to merit own page, much better served on the larger Simpsons character page. mikeman67 ( talk) 01:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice against continuing a merge discussion. Mojo Hand ( talk) 16:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Otto Mann (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references and no real-world information. The Almightey Drill ( talk) 00:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply

  • Weak keep per 1 and 2 and other such references. There's enough real-world, non-Simpsons analysis of the character to warrant an article. I don't necessarily like it but trying to delete even "second tier" characters from franchises like The Simpsons will often be a fruitless endeavour. Stalwart 111 10:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. He's more notable than anyone who will ever comment in this AFD. :) -- do ncr am 01:24, 23 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Merge to List of recurring The Simpsons characters. Otto is no more notable than Agnes Skinner, Kirk Van Houten, Helen Lovejoy, or a host of other characters who have already been redirected to that article.-- NukeofEarl ( talk) 18:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Merge, as per NukeofEarl. Not significant enough to merit own page, much better served on the larger Simpsons character page. mikeman67 ( talk) 01:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook