- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 14:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Optica Software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Constested prod with no significant updates since September. Seven references listed none of which confer notability. Most of them are scientific papers merely mentioning the use of the software to produce a particular image (ie, not significant coverage). Two other sources aren't independent of the software, one being written by its creator. The only significant coverage that is arguably independent of the subject is this corporate blog article, but I'm nervous about its reliability even if one source were sufficient. GDallimore ( Talk) 18:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 22:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, I couldn't find any notability either. – Ugncreative Usergname ( talk) 16:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 14:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Optica Software ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Constested prod with no significant updates since September. Seven references listed none of which confer notability. Most of them are scientific papers merely mentioning the use of the software to produce a particular image (ie, not significant coverage). Two other sources aren't independent of the software, one being written by its creator. The only significant coverage that is arguably independent of the subject is this corporate blog article, but I'm nervous about its reliability even if one source were sufficient. GDallimore ( Talk) 18:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 21:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker talk 22:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, I couldn't find any notability either. – Ugncreative Usergname ( talk) 16:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:37, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.