The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Bootleg Michael Jackson album, fails
WP:FUTUREALBUM: "Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings) is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources."
Popcornduff (
talk)
14:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - It's an unofficial bootleg that has received no media coverage, and it is simply listed at a variety of retail sites that uniformly tell the consumer that it is unavailable. This leads me to wonder if the album ever actually existed, or if it's just a setlist that has been conflated by fans into a legendary lost album. Either way, it is suspiciously obscure for a Michael Jackson item. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
Talk|
Contribs)13:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete: fails
WP:NALBUM. The fact that ten years later not a single reliable source in the last decade has deemed a Michael Jackson product worthy of review tells you everything. The CD/DVD was distributed by a Dutch company that specialises in releasing "public domain content"... that probably means it was an illegal bootleg recording to start with. Either way, there are no sources other than "it exists".
Richard3120 (
talk)
17:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)reply
It was enough to do a research to find these informations writing "One Night In Japan Michael Jackson" on Google. Why don't do researches before to propose the delete?
Simone Jackson (
talk)
18:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Simone Jackson: We did do the research, and we didn't find any notability for the album... existence alone does not make the album notable, we were looking for articles written about the album. The DVD may be notable, having charted in two countries, but if that's all we can say about the DVD, and there is no prose that can be written about it, then this information is better off mentioned in
Michael Jackson albums discography#Video albums.
Richard3120 (
talk)
18:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Bootleg Michael Jackson album, fails
WP:FUTUREALBUM: "Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings) is only notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources."
Popcornduff (
talk)
14:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - It's an unofficial bootleg that has received no media coverage, and it is simply listed at a variety of retail sites that uniformly tell the consumer that it is unavailable. This leads me to wonder if the album ever actually existed, or if it's just a setlist that has been conflated by fans into a legendary lost album. Either way, it is suspiciously obscure for a Michael Jackson item. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (
Talk|
Contribs)13:27, 20 February 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete: fails
WP:NALBUM. The fact that ten years later not a single reliable source in the last decade has deemed a Michael Jackson product worthy of review tells you everything. The CD/DVD was distributed by a Dutch company that specialises in releasing "public domain content"... that probably means it was an illegal bootleg recording to start with. Either way, there are no sources other than "it exists".
Richard3120 (
talk)
17:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)reply
It was enough to do a research to find these informations writing "One Night In Japan Michael Jackson" on Google. Why don't do researches before to propose the delete?
Simone Jackson (
talk)
18:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Simone Jackson: We did do the research, and we didn't find any notability for the album... existence alone does not make the album notable, we were looking for articles written about the album. The DVD may be notable, having charted in two countries, but if that's all we can say about the DVD, and there is no prose that can be written about it, then this information is better off mentioned in
Michael Jackson albums discography#Video albums.
Richard3120 (
talk)
18:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.