From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus emerging from the discussion is that the sources found do rise to the level of significant coverage of the subject. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 17:11, 14 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Omar Shendi

Omar Shendi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 11:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - Meets WP:SPORTCRIT with the link that Canadian Paul. Also lots of mention in books about Egyptian football. Examples one, two, three. I am concerned about these types of nomination of century-old players, who just looking at their accomplishments are undoubtedly going to be notable. Nfitz ( talk) 22:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC) reply
Canadian Paul's source appears to be a fan site, and there's no reason to believe any of those books contain significant coverage of the subject. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 22:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC) reply
It's a blog - not the best ... but who blogs about non-notable 100-year old players? I don't know how you've drawn that conclusion. Nfitz ( talk) 23:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus emerging from the discussion is that the sources found do rise to the level of significant coverage of the subject. (non-admin closure) Enos733 ( talk) 17:11, 14 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Omar Shendi

Omar Shendi (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:SPORTCRIT due to lack of significant coverage. A search per WP:BEFORE did not turn up any significant coverage. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 11:57, 30 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:22, 7 May 2022 (UTC) reply

  • Keep - Meets WP:SPORTCRIT with the link that Canadian Paul. Also lots of mention in books about Egyptian football. Examples one, two, three. I am concerned about these types of nomination of century-old players, who just looking at their accomplishments are undoubtedly going to be notable. Nfitz ( talk) 22:12, 10 May 2022 (UTC) reply
Canadian Paul's source appears to be a fan site, and there's no reason to believe any of those books contain significant coverage of the subject. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 ( talk) 22:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC) reply
It's a blog - not the best ... but who blogs about non-notable 100-year old players? I don't know how you've drawn that conclusion. Nfitz ( talk) 23:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook