The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Kaizenify What? He literally fails every criteria in both; never participated in a major (not even a minor) amateur or professional competition and never won any honours, let alone significant, so a complete fail of NBOX. Unless I’m missing something, there is no significant coverage of any depth (not even routine sports results), so a complete fail of GNG/BASIC. I’d like to see some sources to validate your vote please. –
2.
O.
Boxing10:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete My search found no evidence that he meets any of the boxing notability criteria or has the significant independent coverage required to meet
WP:GNG.
Papaursa (
talk)
03:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)reply
That last source says "But we cannot forget the disappointment to Nigeria caused by the retirement of Ola Enoch, former triple champion". I think we should establish what that championship was before deleting the article.
SpinningSpark11:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
It wouldn't hurt to know that, but there's no evidence he won (or even fought for) any titles that would show WP notability. Boxrec shows he had only 7 pro fights--all in England and all in a span of 5 months. Passing mentions do not show that he meets
WP:GNG.
Papaursa (
talk)
13:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
If the title was a notable one per NBOX (
listed here) it would be listed on boxrec. There’s a chance it could be an amateur title, but it’s hard to establish what title it was when the subject completely fails GNG. That failure to satisfy GNG makes whatever title he may have held irrelevant. –
2.
O.
Boxing14:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Kaizenify What? He literally fails every criteria in both; never participated in a major (not even a minor) amateur or professional competition and never won any honours, let alone significant, so a complete fail of NBOX. Unless I’m missing something, there is no significant coverage of any depth (not even routine sports results), so a complete fail of GNG/BASIC. I’d like to see some sources to validate your vote please. –
2.
O.
Boxing10:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete My search found no evidence that he meets any of the boxing notability criteria or has the significant independent coverage required to meet
WP:GNG.
Papaursa (
talk)
03:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)reply
That last source says "But we cannot forget the disappointment to Nigeria caused by the retirement of Ola Enoch, former triple champion". I think we should establish what that championship was before deleting the article.
SpinningSpark11:51, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
It wouldn't hurt to know that, but there's no evidence he won (or even fought for) any titles that would show WP notability. Boxrec shows he had only 7 pro fights--all in England and all in a span of 5 months. Passing mentions do not show that he meets
WP:GNG.
Papaursa (
talk)
13:55, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
If the title was a notable one per NBOX (
listed here) it would be listed on boxrec. There’s a chance it could be an amateur title, but it’s hard to establish what title it was when the subject completely fails GNG. That failure to satisfy GNG makes whatever title he may have held irrelevant. –
2.
O.
Boxing14:44, 8 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.