- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Okayceci
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Okayceci ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Okayceci discography ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a musician, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. As always, every musician is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because she exists -- she has to accomplish something quantifiably significant, and have a significant volume and depth of media coverage about her, in order to qualify for inclusion. But this literally just states that she exists, doesn't even attempt a meaningful notability claim beyond "she exists", and is referenced to just one Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself in the first person in an online magazine, which isn't enough sourcing to claim that she would pass WP:GNG. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she does meet the necessary standard of substance and sourcing, but this isn't already enough. Bearcat ( talk) 16:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- ETA: per followup comment by Skynxnex, also adding a separate discography article which just lists a handful of non-album singles, and cites no sources at all to establish notability for any of them. Bearcat ( talk) 16:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America. Bearcat ( talk) 16:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex ( talk) 16:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. @ Bearcat: Should Okayceci discography be bundled into this nomination as well? Skynxnex ( talk) 16:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- I hadn't seen that at all, but yeah, it should. I'll add it. Bearcat ( talk) 16:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both - This article, and the online blurbs that it uses as sources, use terms like "up-and-coming" and "rising" which are dead giveaways of a promotional effort by herself and/or a manager, and someone simply copied those blurbs into WP. Good luck to her as she gets started, but she does not qualify for an article here until she gets noticed by reliable and significant music media. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 13:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both Due to WP:PROMOTION. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Okayceci
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Okayceci ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Okayceci discography ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a musician, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. As always, every musician is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because she exists -- she has to accomplish something quantifiably significant, and have a significant volume and depth of media coverage about her, in order to qualify for inclusion. But this literally just states that she exists, doesn't even attempt a meaningful notability claim beyond "she exists", and is referenced to just one Q&A interview in which she's talking about herself in the first person in an online magazine, which isn't enough sourcing to claim that she would pass WP:GNG. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the future if and when she does meet the necessary standard of substance and sourcing, but this isn't already enough. Bearcat ( talk) 16:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- ETA: per followup comment by Skynxnex, also adding a separate discography article which just lists a handful of non-album singles, and cites no sources at all to establish notability for any of them. Bearcat ( talk) 16:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America. Bearcat ( talk) 16:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex ( talk) 16:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. @ Bearcat: Should Okayceci discography be bundled into this nomination as well? Skynxnex ( talk) 16:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- I hadn't seen that at all, but yeah, it should. I'll add it. Bearcat ( talk) 16:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both - This article, and the online blurbs that it uses as sources, use terms like "up-and-coming" and "rising" which are dead giveaways of a promotional effort by herself and/or a manager, and someone simply copied those blurbs into WP. Good luck to her as she gets started, but she does not qualify for an article here until she gets noticed by reliable and significant music media. --- DOOMSDAYER520 ( TALK| CONTRIBS) 13:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both Due to WP:PROMOTION. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.