The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 02:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Apart from the fact this reads like an advert and at a minimum needs a re-write, I'm not convinced it satisfies WP:N. Of the three references listed, one is an ad, one is trivial and the last is more substantial but also reads like PR material. Couldn't find anything else on google or elsewhere that qualifies as a reliable source. 2 says you, says two 22:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 02:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC) reply
Apart from the fact this reads like an advert and at a minimum needs a re-write, I'm not convinced it satisfies WP:N. Of the three references listed, one is an ad, one is trivial and the last is more substantial but also reads like PR material. Couldn't find anything else on google or elsewhere that qualifies as a reliable source. 2 says you, says two 22:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC) reply