- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 07:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oddhouse Phatom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
List article of every episode of Oddhouse Phantom. I am unable to find any sources to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:LISTN. - Mr X 17:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as subject is nonnotable to the extent it even exists; otherwise a hoax. I've only been able to find a couple (amateur) Youtube videos to even verify anything exists at all by this name (whether one gives the benefit of the "n" in the second word or not), let alone a whole history of video releases. At best this is something someone made up one day. postdlf ( talk) 18:21, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Postdif. If any of these exist, even at an amateur level, it would be a WP:SELFPROMOTION list. MarnetteD| Talk 02:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails stand-alone list notability criteria. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Philg88 ♦ talk 07:46, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 07:04, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oddhouse Phatom ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
List article of every episode of Oddhouse Phantom. I am unable to find any sources to establish notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:LISTN. - Mr X 17:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:10, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as subject is nonnotable to the extent it even exists; otherwise a hoax. I've only been able to find a couple (amateur) Youtube videos to even verify anything exists at all by this name (whether one gives the benefit of the "n" in the second word or not), let alone a whole history of video releases. At best this is something someone made up one day. postdlf ( talk) 18:21, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 02:08, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per Postdif. If any of these exist, even at an amateur level, it would be a WP:SELFPROMOTION list. MarnetteD| Talk 02:14, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Fails stand-alone list notability criteria. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Philg88 ♦ talk 07:46, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.