- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 18:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oak and Gorski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable music duo, fails WP:BAND. The article has four sources: Billboard and The Johns Hopkins News-Letter both take quotes from the band, which is not independent coverage; Allkpop, which has been identified as an unreliable source; and a Kickstarter for Oak and Gorski's EP. Searching for references yields only one other citation from the Daily Bruin, which is another quote-ridden source that is not independent coverage, thus failing WP:GNG. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 ( talk) 18:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Oak and Gorski ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable music duo, fails WP:BAND. The article has four sources: Billboard and The Johns Hopkins News-Letter both take quotes from the band, which is not independent coverage; Allkpop, which has been identified as an unreliable source; and a Kickstarter for Oak and Gorski's EP. Searching for references yields only one other citation from the Daily Bruin, which is another quote-ridden source that is not independent coverage, thus failing WP:GNG. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ✗ plicit 05:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.