The result was keep. In addition to the breadth of the support for keep, I call specific attention to TheCatalyst31's reply below. It is my observation that there is ample precedent (but no formal policy I'm aware of) for presuming the notability of well-verified, populated geographic places, even when there is a lack of secondary sourcing. -- joe decker talk to me 21:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply
There is no evidence provided that this place exists as described, that is as a community. There is a University of Notre Dame, of course, and a post office on campus also called "Notre Dame." Other than that there does not seem to be any published evidence for a Notre Dame community extending beyond the University campus. BigJim707 ( talk) 00:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. In addition to the breadth of the support for keep, I call specific attention to TheCatalyst31's reply below. It is my observation that there is ample precedent (but no formal policy I'm aware of) for presuming the notability of well-verified, populated geographic places, even when there is a lack of secondary sourcing. -- joe decker talk to me 21:01, 2 July 2011 (UTC) reply
There is no evidence provided that this place exists as described, that is as a community. There is a University of Notre Dame, of course, and a post office on campus also called "Notre Dame." Other than that there does not seem to be any published evidence for a Notre Dame community extending beyond the University campus. BigJim707 ( talk) 00:25, 25 June 2011 (UTC) reply