The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article is very badly written. Of the four references, not a single one mentions the company's name, or is in any way related to it. It claims to have one hundred users. Wow! I do not find anything from a
WP:BEFORE search. Since it has an infobox and references, I expect that a
speedy nomination would be contested. jp×g11:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The article appears to have been blanked by its creator, whose WP user name is the same as someone identifying on LinkedIn as the company's chief technology officer. This may be merely a misguided attempt to write a WP article about a subject too close to home. If you're the creator of this article and have had second thoughts about it, you don't need to blank it; you can also request its speedy deletion by adding the template {{Db-G7}} as the only person who's made significant input. This doesn't preclude the creation of another article when better sources are available; it is likely to be
WP:TOOSOON. Alternatively, since there was no prod, and no conflict, this could be soft-deleted.
Elemimele (
talk)
13:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Fails most (if not all) of
WP:NBUSINESS, and the infobox and references fail
WP:CORPDEPTH. The references that were included before failed establishing notability entirely. To be honest, I think CSD A7 could've applied here anyway, since the infobox doesn't indicate importance in any plausible way (5 employees, 2 years old?)
WhoAteMyButter (
📨talk│
📝contribs)
06:31, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
This article is very badly written. Of the four references, not a single one mentions the company's name, or is in any way related to it. It claims to have one hundred users. Wow! I do not find anything from a
WP:BEFORE search. Since it has an infobox and references, I expect that a
speedy nomination would be contested. jp×g11:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The article appears to have been blanked by its creator, whose WP user name is the same as someone identifying on LinkedIn as the company's chief technology officer. This may be merely a misguided attempt to write a WP article about a subject too close to home. If you're the creator of this article and have had second thoughts about it, you don't need to blank it; you can also request its speedy deletion by adding the template {{Db-G7}} as the only person who's made significant input. This doesn't preclude the creation of another article when better sources are available; it is likely to be
WP:TOOSOON. Alternatively, since there was no prod, and no conflict, this could be soft-deleted.
Elemimele (
talk)
13:23, 1 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Fails most (if not all) of
WP:NBUSINESS, and the infobox and references fail
WP:CORPDEPTH. The references that were included before failed establishing notability entirely. To be honest, I think CSD A7 could've applied here anyway, since the infobox doesn't indicate importance in any plausible way (5 employees, 2 years old?)
WhoAteMyButter (
📨talk│
📝contribs)
06:31, 2 January 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.