The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a musician not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NMUSIC. The closest thing to a legitimate notability claim here is producing a notable album, which isn't an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of
WP:GNG-worthy media coverage about him -- but the only footnotes are discogs.com and Spotify, neither of which are notability-building sources, and the article is otherwise so highly advertorialized that I'd have speedy deleted it as a G11 if it hadn't existed for a full decade already.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better than this, and the POV here is so egregious that even if he could be salvaged with better sourcing the article would have to be completely rewritten from scratch anyway.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 12:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
WP:BLP of a musician not
properly referenced as passing
WP:NMUSIC. The closest thing to a legitimate notability claim here is producing a notable album, which isn't an instant inclusion freebie in the absence of
WP:GNG-worthy media coverage about him -- but the only footnotes are discogs.com and Spotify, neither of which are notability-building sources, and the article is otherwise so highly advertorialized that I'd have speedy deleted it as a G11 if it hadn't existed for a full decade already.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better than this, and the POV here is so egregious that even if he could be salvaged with better sourcing the article would have to be completely rewritten from scratch anyway.
Bearcat (
talk)
16:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)