From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Nirahua Entertainment

Nirahua Entertainment (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sourcing found, mostly a list of non-notable artists. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. I think we can safely disregard Times of India as a source for notability purposes per WP:TOI. However, even if we include it, I'm not seeing the significant coverage required for WP:GNG. Considering also that WP:NCORP applies, which establishes a higher standard of source independence, I'm not seeing the coverage needed to establish notability. Actualcpscm ( talk) 14:38, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Nirahua Entertainment

Nirahua Entertainment (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sourcing found, mostly a list of non-notable artists. Oaktree b ( talk) 14:49, 26 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC) reply

  • Delete. I think we can safely disregard Times of India as a source for notability purposes per WP:TOI. However, even if we include it, I'm not seeing the significant coverage required for WP:GNG. Considering also that WP:NCORP applies, which establishes a higher standard of source independence, I'm not seeing the coverage needed to establish notability. Actualcpscm ( talk) 14:38, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:52, 9 August 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook