- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 22:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Nina Cuso
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nina Cuso ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No in-depth third-party coverage from reliable sources, just references to a few shows that the subject collaborated on. Created by group of now-blocked single-purpose accounts. Prod tag was disputed by anon editor. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't seem to meet general notability or notability for creative professionals. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. PohranicniStraze ( talk) 02:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Provided better sourcing can be added by neutral users. TH1980 ( talk) 04:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I edited the article to make it closer to NPOV, but of the opinion that a young fashion designer doing the job of a fashion designer does not make that person notable (yet). If it is kept, all the stuff about TV and film appearances should be cut. References are weak. For example, ref #1, relevant content is one sketch from NC, no text. David notMD ( talk) 12:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: per David notMD, the references are weak enough to merit deletion; and per PohranicniStraze, the subject doesn't meet our notability guidelines for creative professionals. Might become famous later on, but we can always recreate the page if warranted. — Javert2113 ( Let's chat!) 13:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 15:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 15:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mz7 ( talk) 22:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Nina Cuso
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nina Cuso ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No in-depth third-party coverage from reliable sources, just references to a few shows that the subject collaborated on. Created by group of now-blocked single-purpose accounts. Prod tag was disputed by anon editor. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't seem to meet general notability or notability for creative professionals. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. PohranicniStraze ( talk) 02:06, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Provided better sourcing can be added by neutral users. TH1980 ( talk) 04:38, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I edited the article to make it closer to NPOV, but of the opinion that a young fashion designer doing the job of a fashion designer does not make that person notable (yet). If it is kept, all the stuff about TV and film appearances should be cut. References are weak. For example, ref #1, relevant content is one sketch from NC, no text. David notMD ( talk) 12:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: per David notMD, the references are weak enough to merit deletion; and per PohranicniStraze, the subject doesn't meet our notability guidelines for creative professionals. Might become famous later on, but we can always recreate the page if warranted. — Javert2113 ( Let's chat!) 13:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 15:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 15:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.