The result was redirect to Geo News. This is a tricky one. Whilst being completely aware of WP:CSB, the fact remains that the article has no independent third party sources at all. That doesn't mean they don't exist, of course. Therefore I suggest redirecting the article to Geo News for the time being, keeping the edit history, so that it can be quickly recreated if suitable sources are found Black Kite 13:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Searches do not yield reliable, significant coverage. I can only find two mentions on Google News, one mentioning that she is a presenter on a programme called "51%" and the other in a list of names "Some renowned figures including ... Nida Sameer". Insufficient evidence of notability. -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 16:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. I'm the person who contested the PROD, and I noted at Talk:Nida Sameer that the person is clearly a TV presenter. Numerous links provided at Talk demonstrate that. Also, I posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistan asking for others to add to the article. I don't see any evidence the AFD nominator considered those facts, or saw the Talk. The AFD nom statement appears to be cut and pasted from the PROD nomination, without updating for additional info provided. AFD seems inappropriate, even if article is not well developed and remains as a stub for a while, as the person appears notable. -- doncram ( talk) 16:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Geo News. This is a tricky one. Whilst being completely aware of WP:CSB, the fact remains that the article has no independent third party sources at all. That doesn't mean they don't exist, of course. Therefore I suggest redirecting the article to Geo News for the time being, keeping the edit history, so that it can be quickly recreated if suitable sources are found Black Kite 13:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Searches do not yield reliable, significant coverage. I can only find two mentions on Google News, one mentioning that she is a presenter on a programme called "51%" and the other in a list of names "Some renowned figures including ... Nida Sameer". Insufficient evidence of notability. -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 16:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Keep. I'm the person who contested the PROD, and I noted at Talk:Nida Sameer that the person is clearly a TV presenter. Numerous links provided at Talk demonstrate that. Also, I posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pakistan asking for others to add to the article. I don't see any evidence the AFD nominator considered those facts, or saw the Talk. The AFD nom statement appears to be cut and pasted from the PROD nomination, without updating for additional info provided. AFD seems inappropriate, even if article is not well developed and remains as a stub for a while, as the person appears notable. -- doncram ( talk) 16:35, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply