The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. This particular discussion is going nowhere; anyone who is not a sock may feel free to renominate.
Drmies (
talk)
20:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Notable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math.
Citterz (
talk) 16:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Update Nom: UnNotable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math. (I forget to add UN to avoid confusion)
Citterz (
talk) 17:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
23:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Citterz Sorry but this is not sufficiently explained which policy the subject does fail of - looks more like your personal opinion. Further it seems that you did not any
Wikipedia:BEFORE search at all. Please make yourself comfortable with the AfD process.
CommanderWaterford (
talk)
20:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)reply
He's famous in Spain: many newspapers has covered his way, and he has appeared on TV magazines, too.. Please, don't remove him — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Remitbuber (
talk •
contribs) Remitbuber Can you first clear your COI? Please explain what connection you do have with this person?
Comment. What exactly is the nominator's rationale for suggesting that the article be deleted? "Notable mathematical activist" sounds like a reason to keep the article, not to delete it.
Nsk92 (
talk)
00:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep per
WP:SK#1 as the nominator has not advanced any argument for deletion or redirection. If the article should be deleted then a discussion should be started with a proper rationale.
Phil Bridger (
talk)
11:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Since an updated nomination rationale has been provided, SK#1 probably no longer applies, although I am unsure to what extent we are supposed to entertain an AfD nomination from a confirmed sock. In any case, as MarkH21 notes below, the subject satisfies
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO for his social activism. Apart from sources mentioned by MarkH21, there are others, e.g.
[1] and
[2].
Nsk92 (
talk)
11:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)reply
CommentUpdate Nom: UnNotable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math. (I forget to add UN to avoid confusion)
Citterz (
talk) 17:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
23:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep: SK#1 is no longer valid with the later clarification by the nominator, but the nominator was later blocked and therefore should be discounted anyways. Independent of the validity of speedy keep criteria, the subject probably passes
WP:GNG with significant coverage in
Noticias de Navarra,
El Mundo, and
Diario Vasco. — MarkH21talk01:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Whatever do you mean, "brief"? We already have examples of in-depth coverage from February 2020
[3], July 2020
[4], August 2020
[5], December 2020
[6], December 2020
[7], and April 2021
[8], spanning over a year. That's plenty
WP:SUSTAINED, especially for the subject who is just 16 years old himself.
Nsk92 (
talk)
19:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: It turns out that the article creator
Remitbuber changed the nomination text early on in this edit, which is what led to this whole hullabaloo (in addition to the nominator being a sock, of course). — MarkH21talk20:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. This particular discussion is going nowhere; anyone who is not a sock may feel free to renominate.
Drmies (
talk)
20:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Notable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math.
Citterz (
talk) 16:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Update Nom: UnNotable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math. (I forget to add UN to avoid confusion)
Citterz (
talk) 17:33, 12 April 2021 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
23:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Citterz Sorry but this is not sufficiently explained which policy the subject does fail of - looks more like your personal opinion. Further it seems that you did not any
Wikipedia:BEFORE search at all. Please make yourself comfortable with the AfD process.
CommanderWaterford (
talk)
20:27, 10 April 2021 (UTC)reply
He's famous in Spain: many newspapers has covered his way, and he has appeared on TV magazines, too.. Please, don't remove him — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Remitbuber (
talk •
contribs) Remitbuber Can you first clear your COI? Please explain what connection you do have with this person?
Comment. What exactly is the nominator's rationale for suggesting that the article be deleted? "Notable mathematical activist" sounds like a reason to keep the article, not to delete it.
Nsk92 (
talk)
00:59, 11 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Speedy Keep per
WP:SK#1 as the nominator has not advanced any argument for deletion or redirection. If the article should be deleted then a discussion should be started with a proper rationale.
Phil Bridger (
talk)
11:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Since an updated nomination rationale has been provided, SK#1 probably no longer applies, although I am unsure to what extent we are supposed to entertain an AfD nomination from a confirmed sock. In any case, as MarkH21 notes below, the subject satisfies
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO for his social activism. Apart from sources mentioned by MarkH21, there are others, e.g.
[1] and
[2].
Nsk92 (
talk)
11:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)reply
CommentUpdate Nom: UnNotable mathematical activist who is trying to raise awareness about the importance of math. (I forget to add UN to avoid confusion)
Citterz (
talk) 17:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet,
Atlantic306 (
talk)
23:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Keep: SK#1 is no longer valid with the later clarification by the nominator, but the nominator was later blocked and therefore should be discounted anyways. Independent of the validity of speedy keep criteria, the subject probably passes
WP:GNG with significant coverage in
Noticias de Navarra,
El Mundo, and
Diario Vasco. — MarkH21talk01:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Whatever do you mean, "brief"? We already have examples of in-depth coverage from February 2020
[3], July 2020
[4], August 2020
[5], December 2020
[6], December 2020
[7], and April 2021
[8], spanning over a year. That's plenty
WP:SUSTAINED, especially for the subject who is just 16 years old himself.
Nsk92 (
talk)
19:56, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: It turns out that the article creator
Remitbuber changed the nomination text early on in this edit, which is what led to this whole hullabaloo (in addition to the nominator being a sock, of course). — MarkH21talk20:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.