The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. The good folks at Project Ice Hockey have done a great job of establishing guidelines for notability, and the subject here doesn't pass them (he would need to have played in at least 200 games in the AHL). Also, the sources in the article are of the routine type that one typically sees when athletes sign with a team, so I'm not seeing the significant coverage that would be required to meet the general notability guidelines.
NewYorkActuary (
talk) 23:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails NHOCKEY and not finding significant coverage.
Rlendog (
talk) 01:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as examining the article still found nothing better for the applicable notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 18:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. The good folks at Project Ice Hockey have done a great job of establishing guidelines for notability, and the subject here doesn't pass them (he would need to have played in at least 200 games in the AHL). Also, the sources in the article are of the routine type that one typically sees when athletes sign with a team, so I'm not seeing the significant coverage that would be required to meet the general notability guidelines.
NewYorkActuary (
talk) 23:42, 15 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails NHOCKEY and not finding significant coverage.
Rlendog (
talk) 01:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as examining the article still found nothing better for the applicable notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 18:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.