- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Nick Delgado
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nick Delgado ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is unsourced and I found nothing in Pubmed that appears attributable to him. He's also not an endocrinologist, contrary to the article. There doesn't seem to be a compelling reason to keep this article. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 03:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Businesspeople. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 03:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Just an advertorial. Xxanthippe ( talk) 05:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC).
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 07:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, this is pure promotion, does not meet WP:BIO. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 16:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence that he meets any WP notability criteria, including WP:GNG. Papaursa ( talk) 03:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:50, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Nick Delgado
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Nick Delgado ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is unsourced and I found nothing in Pubmed that appears attributable to him. He's also not an endocrinologist, contrary to the article. There doesn't seem to be a compelling reason to keep this article. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 03:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Businesspeople. ScienceFlyer ( talk) 03:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Just an advertorial. Xxanthippe ( talk) 05:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC).
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 07:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, this is pure promotion, does not meet WP:BIO. Ari T. Benchaim ( talk) 16:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence that he meets any WP notability criteria, including WP:GNG. Papaursa ( talk) 03:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.