- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Samuel Edward Konkin III#Political opinions. Star Mississippi 03:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
New Libertarian Manifesto
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- New Libertarian Manifesto ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has existed more or less as a perma-stub since its creation in 2008. All of its references are primary sources, with only brief one-line reviews taken from the "Praise" section of the book itself. I found only one passing reference to it in only one of my sources (Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought, 2020), as a small part of a broader section about Konkin. As this manifesto doesn't appear to meet our notability guidelines, I propose that this article be merged into/redirected to the article on Samuel Edward Konkin III. Grnrchst ( talk) 18:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Libertarianism, Politics, and Economics. Grnrchst ( talk) 18:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Samuel Edward Konkin III#Political opinions. There is no independent notability to this subject that I can find in any secondary sources, and there is nothing worthwhile to merge. For policy rationale, this article appears to fall best under WP:PROMO and certainly fails all five criteria under WP:GNG. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 15:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Samuel Edward Konkin III#Political opinions. Star Mississippi 03:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
New Libertarian Manifesto
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- New Libertarian Manifesto ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has existed more or less as a perma-stub since its creation in 2008. All of its references are primary sources, with only brief one-line reviews taken from the "Praise" section of the book itself. I found only one passing reference to it in only one of my sources (Routledge Handbook of Anarchy and Anarchist Thought, 2020), as a small part of a broader section about Konkin. As this manifesto doesn't appear to meet our notability guidelines, I propose that this article be merged into/redirected to the article on Samuel Edward Konkin III. Grnrchst ( talk) 18:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Libertarianism, Politics, and Economics. Grnrchst ( talk) 18:11, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to Samuel Edward Konkin III#Political opinions. There is no independent notability to this subject that I can find in any secondary sources, and there is nothing worthwhile to merge. For policy rationale, this article appears to fall best under WP:PROMO and certainly fails all five criteria under WP:GNG. Cheers, Last1in ( talk) 15:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.