The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Redirect (at best). Page does not contain a single
WP:RS. A search via Newsbank database found 11 brief mentions, nothing that clearly meets
WP:RS to establish notability to meet
WP:NORG, but probably sufficient to justify a brief section in the main article as suggested by nom.
Cabrils (
talk)
01:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge into
World Union for Progressive Judaism. The World Union for Progressive Judaism is weak on this important content and it would be disservice to WP if we do not set this straight in the procedure. Same applies to and attempting to broaden the discussion to:
Hopefully not to late to include this. Both mergers will ease the article fragementation that currently lead to a user experience from hell.
gidonb (
talk)
19:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Redirect (at best). Page does not contain a single
WP:RS. A search via Newsbank database found 11 brief mentions, nothing that clearly meets
WP:RS to establish notability to meet
WP:NORG, but probably sufficient to justify a brief section in the main article as suggested by nom.
Cabrils (
talk)
01:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge into
World Union for Progressive Judaism. The World Union for Progressive Judaism is weak on this important content and it would be disservice to WP if we do not set this straight in the procedure. Same applies to and attempting to broaden the discussion to:
Hopefully not to late to include this. Both mergers will ease the article fragementation that currently lead to a user experience from hell.
gidonb (
talk)
19:52, 2 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.