The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 07:45, 19 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Nettie’s House of Spaghetti

Nettie’s House of Spaghetti (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. The restaurant has been in the press for a new policy banning children under the age of 10. There are no other sources in the article about anything else other than this ban and no other in-depth sources were found in a Google search to support the claim of notability. Alansohn ( talk) 05:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Alansohn ( talk) 05:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 08:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 08:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete - seems to me that there are two possible policy considerations for notability. Firstly the WP:GNG and/or WP:NCORP. For me that's a transparent failure, it's a non-notable neighbourhood restaurant. The other is WP:EVENT. If we assume the banning of children is an event, I would say that Cat1 and Cat2 fail to meet the necessary level of media engagement. I guess that could change, but then wouldn't that be WP:TOOSOON? JMWt ( talk) 11:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete - rather plainly failing to show this small and somewhat ordinary restaurant is noteworthy, even if it briefly hit the news once by announcing a policy. If it were to go on hitting the news, that would be another matter, but as JMWt states above, it's way too soon to tell if that will happen, and the WP:CRYSTALBALL approach isn't a reliable guide to the future. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:38, 12 February 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete: Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, one news story about a business isn't enough to merit an article. An article might be possible in future if there's significant coverage of the subject. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 01:28, 13 February 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete per the nomination and above comments; the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP and may also violate WP:NOTNEWS

InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 18:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC) reply

• Comment @ InterstellarGamer12321:@ StarryNightSky11: You guys SURE this place fails both NCORP AND GNG? Sounds to me like WP:BEFORE wasn't followed. Americanfreedom ( talk) 18:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Americanfreedom, I created this AfD. I looked at the article and the sources present. I searched online for sources. All I found were rather run-of-the-mill reviews and multiple articles about the under-ten-age policy. Nothing that I found meets the in-depth, non-routine coverage in reliable and verifiable independent sources that would be required to meet either NCORP or GNG. The link you provide offers the same list of reviews and recent news that I saw when I submitted the nomination. Can you point to any sources that would satisfy either NCORP or GNG, either in the article or that could be added? I am open to withdrawing the nomination, but I would need to see evidence to convince me to do so. Alansohn ( talk) 19:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC) reply

    Did you even CLICK the link? Americanfreedom ( talk) 19:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC) reply

• Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. I clicked the link above by the way, and there's the regular reviews that any local restaurant gets, and a few side mentions of the under 10 policy. Nothing in there I feel gives this restaurant enough to meet our guidelines. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 20:42, 17 February 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.