The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
BLP article does not meet GNG, BASIC or MUSICBIO. BEFORE showing nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly an in-depth, they're mentions within articles about other subjects. Guidelines and sourcing requirements should be strictly followed for BLPs //
Timothy :: talk21:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment None of the above sources meet
WP:SIGCOV. They are photo galleries, click bait articles, promo pieces. Other pieces I found were mentions in articles about other subjects. I'm sure she is talented and famous, but there is just not coverage that meets RS/SIGCOV. I'm not sure about a redirect to Bon Bon Girls, but much of the information is already there. //
Timothy :: talk03:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak delete or Merge/Redirect to
BonBon Girls 303. I'm a weak delete on this because it seems like she has some notoriety. Although, the sources provided so far seem a little on the weak side and mostly about her musical career. Which is why I think merging/redirecting to
BonBon Girls 303 would be a good option. Plus, she's already mentioned there and it could really use some expanding anyway. BTW, the same could probably go for the articles on the other members in the group. --
Adamant1 (
talk)
10:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: I'd agree with a Redirect if others think it is appropriate. Content here is unsourced, so I would disagree with merging unsourced information especially in a BLP. //
Timothy :: talk12:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not from what I can tell because MilkShake doesn't seem to be independently notable (at least not going by the article about it) and the fact that it was only around for a year. There's zero proof she was a "prominent member" of it when it was around anyway, or that she is one of the other group now for that matter. BTW, the MilkShake article seems to have been created by a SPA. Which bods even less well for it. --
Adamant1 (
talk)
14:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
BLP article does not meet GNG, BASIC or MUSICBIO. BEFORE showing nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly an in-depth, they're mentions within articles about other subjects. Guidelines and sourcing requirements should be strictly followed for BLPs //
Timothy :: talk21:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment None of the above sources meet
WP:SIGCOV. They are photo galleries, click bait articles, promo pieces. Other pieces I found were mentions in articles about other subjects. I'm sure she is talented and famous, but there is just not coverage that meets RS/SIGCOV. I'm not sure about a redirect to Bon Bon Girls, but much of the information is already there. //
Timothy :: talk03:40, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Weak delete or Merge/Redirect to
BonBon Girls 303. I'm a weak delete on this because it seems like she has some notoriety. Although, the sources provided so far seem a little on the weak side and mostly about her musical career. Which is why I think merging/redirecting to
BonBon Girls 303 would be a good option. Plus, she's already mentioned there and it could really use some expanding anyway. BTW, the same could probably go for the articles on the other members in the group. --
Adamant1 (
talk)
10:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment: I'd agree with a Redirect if others think it is appropriate. Content here is unsourced, so I would disagree with merging unsourced information especially in a BLP. //
Timothy :: talk12:05, 4 October 2020 (UTC)reply
Not from what I can tell because MilkShake doesn't seem to be independently notable (at least not going by the article about it) and the fact that it was only around for a year. There's zero proof she was a "prominent member" of it when it was around anyway, or that she is one of the other group now for that matter. BTW, the MilkShake article seems to have been created by a SPA. Which bods even less well for it. --
Adamant1 (
talk)
14:40, 7 October 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.