The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There is not enough media coverage to establish that this music award is
notable. Of the current references, only one is not the NAMA website itself, and that one does not mention NAMA at all. All references I found were passing mentions of the "X won Y Native American Music Awards" kind, plus
this piece that reads like a press release, not news coverage. Even if better sources could be found, the current article would have to be rewritten in its entirety to bring it in line with what those hypothetical sources will report.
Huon (
talk) 19:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Yes, these awards are notable and mentioned by innumerable news source
[1]. It needs better citations, but the article is already flagged for needing citations.
Yuchitown (
talk) 20:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Yuchitownreply
Keep. Notability appears to be clear and established. I'll defer to
User:Rhododendrites's contributions as perfect examples.
KaisaL (
talk) 03:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Notable within the Native American community and with adequate outside, third-party coverage noting its importance. Passes GNG. Quality and notability are not the same thing.
Montanabw(talk) 02:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
There is not enough media coverage to establish that this music award is
notable. Of the current references, only one is not the NAMA website itself, and that one does not mention NAMA at all. All references I found were passing mentions of the "X won Y Native American Music Awards" kind, plus
this piece that reads like a press release, not news coverage. Even if better sources could be found, the current article would have to be rewritten in its entirety to bring it in line with what those hypothetical sources will report.
Huon (
talk) 19:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Yes, these awards are notable and mentioned by innumerable news source
[1]. It needs better citations, but the article is already flagged for needing citations.
Yuchitown (
talk) 20:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)Yuchitownreply
Keep. Notability appears to be clear and established. I'll defer to
User:Rhododendrites's contributions as perfect examples.
KaisaL (
talk) 03:05, 2 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Notable within the Native American community and with adequate outside, third-party coverage noting its importance. Passes GNG. Quality and notability are not the same thing.
Montanabw(talk) 02:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.