The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails WP:GNG and the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL, his professional play being limited to 109 minutes (barely more than one game) in the league and no cup games. Also has had an unassuming amateur career since leaving the pro tier.
Geschichte (
talk) 07:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me.
GiantSnowman 18:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: Passing NFOOTY does not automatically make a subject notable.
GauchoDude (
talk) 16:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I disagree with that argument.--
Ortizesp (
talk) 16:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment:
WP:ATHLETE states that "If the article does meet the criteria set forth below [as in NFOOTY], then it is likely that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article," then later "The guideline on this page provides bright-line guidance to enable editors to determine quickly if a subject is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline." The purpose of this AfD is to shed light as to whether the subject passes GNG, which it appears they have not, not whether they've made it into 1 minute of a fully professional league.
GauchoDude (
talk) 19:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - there is no indication nor any evidence that Nando Silva meets GNG
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per failing
WP:GNG. 1 minute of
WP:FPL doesn't give automatic notability.
Paul Vaurie (
talk) 18:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Fails WP:GNG and the spirit of WP:NFOOTBALL, his professional play being limited to 109 minutes (barely more than one game) in the league and no cup games. Also has had an unassuming amateur career since leaving the pro tier.
Geschichte (
talk) 07:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one or two appearances is insufficient when GNG is failed so comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me.
GiantSnowman 18:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment: Passing NFOOTY does not automatically make a subject notable.
GauchoDude (
talk) 16:11, 19 October 2021 (UTC)reply
I disagree with that argument.--
Ortizesp (
talk) 16:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Comment:
WP:ATHLETE states that "If the article does meet the criteria set forth below [as in NFOOTY], then it is likely that sufficient sources exist to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article," then later "The guideline on this page provides bright-line guidance to enable editors to determine quickly if a subject is likely to meet the General Notability Guideline." The purpose of this AfD is to shed light as to whether the subject passes GNG, which it appears they have not, not whether they've made it into 1 minute of a fully professional league.
GauchoDude (
talk) 19:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete - there is no indication nor any evidence that Nando Silva meets GNG
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete per failing
WP:GNG. 1 minute of
WP:FPL doesn't give automatic notability.
Paul Vaurie (
talk) 18:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.