The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - @
Sportsfan 1234: you’ve nominated a number of articles about
America’s Next Top Model contestants recently - I’d advise you to in future bundle related topics into one AfD discussion instead of nominating individual articles separately (see
WP:MULTIAFD for instructions). Also, I’d advise you to give a more specific reason than “non-notable person”, per
WP:JNN. Thank you. LinguistunEinsuno 18:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Was
WP:BEFORE observed in this case? The subject is prominently discussed in
this New York Times article, which mentions Mora having written her book and done a TED talk. Also listed as one of the "most fascinating contestants" in
this New York Post article.
bd2412T 19:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Absolutely no notability problem.
Sportsfan 1234, if you feel that the referencing in the article is insufficient you can add references as you wish. AfDs need to be based in research and previous procedures that failed. Not following
WP:BEFORE means that likely you'll be wasting the time of your colleagues.
gidonb (
talk) 23:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per the coverage presented by
bd2412 indicating in-depth coverage even beyond this person's modeling career. --
Oakshade (
talk) 20:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep – winner of a major reality show who went on to work prominently in the field. I would add, however, that the article needs serious work to be up to encyclopedic standard. --
Tenebrae (
talk) 01:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - Commenting strictly on the notability of the article, especially when the reference provided by
bd2412 is added to the article, it will pass
WP:GNG. However, I agree with
Tenebrae the article needs work to be encyclopedic and could be expanded.
Operator873CONNECT 23:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - @
Sportsfan 1234: you’ve nominated a number of articles about
America’s Next Top Model contestants recently - I’d advise you to in future bundle related topics into one AfD discussion instead of nominating individual articles separately (see
WP:MULTIAFD for instructions). Also, I’d advise you to give a more specific reason than “non-notable person”, per
WP:JNN. Thank you. LinguistunEinsuno 18:58, 23 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Was
WP:BEFORE observed in this case? The subject is prominently discussed in
this New York Times article, which mentions Mora having written her book and done a TED talk. Also listed as one of the "most fascinating contestants" in
this New York Post article.
bd2412T 19:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Absolutely no notability problem.
Sportsfan 1234, if you feel that the referencing in the article is insufficient you can add references as you wish. AfDs need to be based in research and previous procedures that failed. Not following
WP:BEFORE means that likely you'll be wasting the time of your colleagues.
gidonb (
talk) 23:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep per the coverage presented by
bd2412 indicating in-depth coverage even beyond this person's modeling career. --
Oakshade (
talk) 20:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep – winner of a major reality show who went on to work prominently in the field. I would add, however, that the article needs serious work to be up to encyclopedic standard. --
Tenebrae (
talk) 01:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep - Commenting strictly on the notability of the article, especially when the reference provided by
bd2412 is added to the article, it will pass
WP:GNG. However, I agree with
Tenebrae the article needs work to be encyclopedic and could be expanded.
Operator873CONNECT 23:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.